Essay 2 Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

2 - Essay ExampleIndependent variables were region, age, and gender. Region referred to the students place of study, and took the value of EU, OS, and UK. Age was divided into two values regular (below 21 years old as of first kinfolk at the year of intake) and mature (below 21 years old as of 1st September at the year of intake). Gender took the values of Male and Female. Frequency count was used to find the r protrudeine of respondents per category. In finding the kin between continuous variables (e. g. scores), Pearsons correlation techniques were used. In finding the relationship between categorical variables, cross tabulation and chi square tests were performed on the data. To investigate the effects of prior(prenominal) maths education on social unit scores and general achievement, t test were conducted. Finally, to find out which variables predicted overall motion, regression analysis was performed. Presentation and Discussion of Results Demographic profile of respond ents There were a lend of 236 respondents surveyed for this study. knock back 1 shows the country of origin of the respondents. Figures indicate that majority if the respondents are from the UK (36.4%), China (25.4%), and India (8.5%). In harm of the Program that the respondents are victorious up, 36.4% are majoring in MSc (Hons) Management (n = 88), 26.3% in Marketing (n = 62), 16.1% in Accounting (n = 38), 12.3% in IBE (n = 29), 3.8% in Human Resources (n = 9), and 3.4% in IS (n = 8). There are 2 respondents each majoring in Decision Making and in Operations. Of the respondents surveyed, 53.8% are from the OS region (n = 127), 36.4% are from the UK region (n = 86), and 9.7% are from the EU region (n = 23). There were 87.3% of respondents who were considered regular students (n = 206), while 12.7% are mature students (n = 30). There were more female respondents in this study at 53.4% (n = 126) compared with male respondents at 46.6% (n = 110). Descriptive Statistics The primary interest of this study is the overall instruction execution of students and the underlying factors that may predict overall performance. As such, it would be helpful to look into the descriptive characteristics of overall performance scores and the individual unit course scores (Anderson, Sweeney, & Williams, 2009). Figure 1 shows that the overall performance scores are skewed to the left, with higher concentration on the 50 to 70 range (Mean = 56.88, SD = 11.7). Table 2 reflects the mean scores of respondents in the different units. The figures indicate that students have the highest mean score in BMAN10001 (10) Economic Principles Microeconomics (Mean = 70.02, SD = 14.77) and the lowest mean scores in BMAN10621 (10) Fundamentals of Financial Reporting. Table 1. Histogram of overall performance scores. Relationship between unit courses and overall performance Overall performance was measured by taking the average of a students unit courses. It is helpful to find out in this in vestigating which unit course affects overall performance most. Table 3 shows the correlation coefficients, Pearsons r, between the unit courses and overall performance. The figures show that overall performan