Gender Inequality in the 1970s Essay -- women, solutions, stereotype, g

There is no upper recoil to the risks men argon willing to take in order to succeed, and if there is an upper limit for women, they will succeed less. ( system Shirky, 202) Shirky, the author of A Rant about Women argues that women must(prenominal) become to a greater extent aggressive and demanding to ultimately achieve their goals. No consider how society reacts, men take on any action, bypassing the Golden territorial dominion to achieve their goals and desires. On the other hand, women lack this procedure in their search for self-promotion, as Shirky argues. However, in Chisholms speech Equal Rights for Women, Chisholm argues that the undeniable flat coat for sexual activity distinction in the 1970s, was the lack of opportunities women were given in the drubplace. Chisholms viewpoint includes the reason women werent treated with equal respect as men, was because women werent given the chance. Both authors battle the reason for gender inequality equally demonstrating how this social problem existed only differentiating on the reasons. In this experiment I will argue that Shirkys attitude on gender inequality is stronger based on the anecdotes he provides of women asserting themselves to become much successful additionally providing a solution for women to become more aggressive. In the 1970s, when a woman walked into an interview, she was questioned if she can type. This occurs because of the stereotype that women usually acquire the bring down standard jobs the less important ones, in other words. The positions women usually occupy include secretaries, librarians, and teachers, because women are viewed as incapable of withholding job options much(prenominal) as managers, administrators, doctors, lawyers, and Members of Congress. As Shirley Chisholm declares in her speech, The unspoken assump... ...unately all the same exists today. Both Shirky and Chisholm work at publicizing this issue to society, however represent different reasons for w herefore this issue exists. Shirky believes women are not as aggressive in demanding self-promotion as well as equality, while Shirley believes the root of gender inequality is the menial amount of opportunities women are given in the workplace in proportion to men. While I consider Shirkys argument stronger, I still agree with Chisholms argument based off of the job position evidence she provides. Based off both articles, women need to become more arrogant and selfish to rightfully demand what is theirs, no matter what the consequence. men can do it, so why cant women? workings CitedChisholm, Shirley. Equal Rights for Women. Washington D.C., May 21, 1969Shirky, Clay. A Rant about Women. Shirky.com. Clay Shirky Blog, January 2010