Wednesday, February 6, 2019
The Execution of Private Slovik Essay -- Literary Analysis, William B
In the cashiers quest for information about the assail of Dresden, he wrote to the channel Force, hoping to gain more knowledge about what went into the decision. His only official rejoinder at the time was that the information was top secret still (11). How bombing of Dresden could ever be considered classified when it had such a devastating rig on so umteen people is just one of the many absurdities pointed out by the narrator in his quest to provide a balanced view of the struggle.One novel, The Execution of Private Slovik by William Bradford Huie, enlarge the only execution of an Ameri quite a little soldier for desertion during World contend II. The narrator quotes from the opinion of a staff judge advocate who support Sloviks sentence, stating If the death penalty is ever to be imposed for desertion, it should be imposed in this case, not as a punitive account nor as retribution, but to maintain that discipline upon which alone an army can succeed (45). The view that a soldier should have to die in order for the military to maintain unit cohesion and essentially ascertain a lesson to other draftees who may want to desert their post is a hard one for those not in the military to sympathize with. Furthermore, it illustrates the ludicrous nature of militaristic actions, where one is forcesd to fight against enemies who wish to do them harm, or face death at the hands of their fellow servicemen if the tell apart not to fight.During a Lions Club luncheon meeting Billy attends back off in Ilium, a Marine Corp Major who had served in Vietnam intercommunicate the attendees. The Marine spoke of his experience serving in Vietnam, and his view that the Americans had no choice but to keep fighting until the Communists realized that they could not force their wa... ...cation of the bombings of Dresden as tit for tat in an attempt to rationalize civil killings is abhorrent to those who see life as sacred, regardless of which side of the noncombatant line one falls.Saundy is much more sympathetic than Eaker to those who lost their lives in the Dresden bombing. Saundy believed that the bombing of Dresden was a great tragedy none can recall, and that it wasnt necessary to the Allies efforts to win the War (187). However, he does defy those who directed the bombing, stating they were neither wicked nor cruel, but instead coerce into making a tough decision in a determining(prenominal) time in the War (187). Saundy presents a much more sympathetic view of the bombing of Dresden than Eaker. Saundy doesnt attempt to justify or correct the bombing he instead portrays it as one of the many horrors of war that can only be viewed in hindsight as such.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment