Hamlet’s Indecision Essay

critical point, the Prince of Denmark, is a b by rights young man with many talents. He is an academic, a witty orator, and a flawless fiddleor. Certainly, he has the potential to do anything he wants which may have included, in the future, being the King of Denmark. His expertness for all things calls into question why there is a great discipline between settlements decision to avenge his gos murder and the actual revenge. It is crossroadss idealism which leads to indecision and the reevaluation of his select to kill Claudius. Hamlet actions should non attri saveed to mental illness but the duty of his soul.He believes fully that men were born depend competent and were meant to do good things. His strong belief system contrasts strikingly with the reality and corruption of the cosmos when he returns home. He comments on the state of Denmark and more specifically his fathers house, Tis an unweeded garden that grows to seed Things rank and gross in spirit possess it merely (Act I, sc ii). He is disgusted not practiced by his home community but the evil which existed in his family. He finds it difficult to resolve his illusions of what his world was with the reality of the situation.It is his idealist personality which allows him to check his bitterness while his internal will pressures him to avenge his fathers death. Hamlet attempts to use logic, a typical idealist characteristic, to determine what run-in of action he moldiness take. Hamlet struggles with idea that he may be a coward for his inaction. At this point in the play Hamlet does not understand that it is his goodness that is delaying his revenge. Despite his nightly supernatural babble with the ghost of his murdered father, he is still unsure if justice should be done by his own hand.Hamlet understands that if Claudius did kill his father he must kill Claudius. He understands that in a world of lies it was strenuous to tell truth from fiction, and a sinner from a saint. Therefore, Ham let must have independent proof that his uncle murdered his father. A play at bottom a play is the only way Hamlet, besides direct conformation, is breathing emerge to be able to tell if Claudius is guilty. It is for this reason that Hamlet invites players in to consummate a murderous play to ferret out the truth from his aim and new father.Hamlets inability to understand the motives of evil in actions and thought can also be attributed to his sole soaring viewpoint. He does not understand why anyone would commit murder and therefore he is uncertain that he had ability to violently kill a man. bloody revenge represents everything that Hamlet is not. Hamlets rational intellect allowed him the pellucidness of mind to understand both the good and bad in the act of the revenge. The mental degradation of Hamlet, is believed to be insanity by the other characters but it was clear to the audience that he is merely coming to terms with what he believes to be right.Hamlet is a religi ous man and murder was a sin. Hamlet is a man of classical philosophy and revenge is not rational. Choosing to appear mentally impair is good strategy because if the characters believe he is unwell, he will not be able to figure out the true. Hamlets true character remains unblemished. Hamlet is a man who believes in chivalry, and slaughter is not gentle. It is those idealistic qualities which causes the postponement of Claudius death. It is in the moment that Hamlet allows his emotion to dominate over his intellect that Claudius was killed.He is consumed by the thoughts of his fathers demise and is haunted by the knowledge that his fathers soul will not be able to rest until his death is avenged. Hamlet willfully concludes, My thoughts be bloody or be nothing worth (Act IV sc iv). It is then that Hamlet finally had the ability to suppress his idealistic nature, and do what is right. The murder is not a well planned scheme and occurs in the heat of the moment. Hamlet, subsequently the murder of Claudius never once wavers in his decision. He has done what is right and believes that There is a special providence in the fall of a sparrow (Act V sc ii).Oddly enough contrabandism is part of idealistic theory and therefore Hamlet always remains true to himself and his idealism. Hamlets idealism makes him the perfect tragic protagonist and leads to theme of indecision. Without his enthusiastic regard for the ideals of truth, justice, goodness and beauty there would be no play. His fatal flaw, the belief that men and therefore the world are inherently good, created a moral dilemma which the characters, and plot revolves. Even Hamlet, the academic, comments on the presence of tragic flaw in human nature. He stated oft it chances in fact men That for some vicious mole of nature in them,As in their birth, wherein they are not guilty, By the oergrowth of some complexion, oftentimes breaking down the pales and forts of reason, Their virtues else, be they as pure as grace, As infinite as man may undergo, Shall in the general reproof take corruption From that particular fault. (Act 1, sc 4). Hamlet continues late in the resolution of the play, though I am not spleenative and rash as yet have I in me something dangerous (Act V. sc i. ) Hamlets idealistic nature mismatched with his pragmatic circumstances, which creates the ultimate theme and brainish force behind all the rising action, falling action, and resolution of this tragedy.